yagathai: (Rocketeer)
yagathai ([personal profile] yagathai) wrote2013-06-17 01:12 am

(no subject)

Read the Matthew Swift books by Kate Griffin, all four currently in circulation. It was recommended to me by [livejournal.com profile] incandescens, whose opinion in these matters is trustworthy (and who, incidentally, should be congratulated on her book deal. The series is highly anticipated in certain circles, especially but not exclusively those named [livejournal.com profile] supertailz).

Quite enjoyed the first one, an urban fantasy that occupies a space much closer to Rivers of London and Neverwhere than Sookie Stackhouse or Anita Blake. There's a generous dollop of Unknown Armies in its bones, too. And by generous dollop, I mean, well, if you draw two buckets of water out of the same well, it's not fair to say that the second bucket of water is derivative of the first exactly, but at the same time they will taste very similar and be difficult to tell apart and after all one of them did come first by over a decade. Also, and though it's done quite well this time around, the angelic-force-trapped-within-and-at-odds-with-a-mortal-protagonist gimmick has been done at least twice in urban fantasy series I've read in the last couple of years.

But, those issues aside, it was well written and engaging and I quite liked it.

Second one was still pretty good, but edging away from Rivers of London and Neverwhere towards someplace Harry Dresdenish, with Sandman Slim's faint gravity tugging, tugging, soft but insistent.

Third one was kind of crap. Sorry. Some compelling passages and fascinating imagery occasionally, but crap all the same. There was a sharp turn towards Simon R. Green doing a terrible Clive Barker impression and it was just No Fun At All.

Fourth one, though, was actually quite good. It took a leisurely swing back towards the style and quality of the first novel, though perhaps a bit clumsier and less polished, with a lot of Raymond Chandlerish "our hero gets knocked out and Wakes Up Elsewhere". Also the last chapter or so is obviously setting up a series-arc with cryptic and ominous portents that seem just a little cliche. Still, quibbles aside, quite entertaining and a welcome return to form.
incandescens: (Kanzeon Bosatsu)

[personal profile] incandescens 2013-06-17 09:01 am (UTC)(link)
(blushes) Thank you very much! I hope it will entertain you when it gets to you.

[identity profile] pocketseizure.livejournal.com 2013-06-17 01:42 pm (UTC)(link)
I haven't heard anything about Rivers of London. Is it any good?

By the way, I took your advice and started lurking on the literature forum of the ASOIAF board. It's awesome. Thank you!

[identity profile] yagathai.livejournal.com 2013-06-17 01:48 pm (UTC)(link)
Rivers of London is excellent, through and through.

[identity profile] oracne.livejournal.com 2013-06-17 02:44 pm (UTC)(link)
Yours is the third review that has said book 3 falters, book 4 is better. Alas, book 3 is next up for me. Need to get motivated.

[identity profile] angalin.livejournal.com 2013-06-18 06:51 am (UTC)(link)
I liked Griffin's book 1 well enough, but not so much that I've felt the urge to seek out the rest. Ben Aaronovitch was way more fun, plus I love the UK covers of his books.

[identity profile] yagathai.livejournal.com 2013-06-18 03:11 pm (UTC)(link)
I don't know about "fun", but I'd agree with "better". And yes, the UK covers are amazing.

[identity profile] supertailz.livejournal.com 2013-06-18 05:01 pm (UTC)(link)
But mostly by me! I had lunch with an editor yesterday and we were both sitting there going ugh, we would like to be reading Invisible Library RIGHT NOW PLS.

[identity profile] pocketseizure.livejournal.com 2013-06-29 08:22 pm (UTC)(link)
I just finished Rivers of London this afternoon. It was amazing. Thank you, seriously.

[identity profile] yagathai.livejournal.com 2013-07-02 06:18 pm (UTC)(link)
Yes? I'm glad. Fourth one comes out in a couple weeks.