They use 'wearable' as a demarcation between high and low fashion; however, they're on the crossroads: while they still have contempt for the average person, recession forces them to become cost-conscious. Hence the slightly split judging persona -- they intuitively loathe the wearable because it signifies accessible, and yet, both have shit to push since the luxury market shrunk so much. MICHAEL by Michael Kors probably outsells his main line, I'm guessing.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
timeasmymeasure
no subject
Date: 2010-11-03 12:40 am (UTC)